Site Loader

Are you interested in natural skin care? Look the who care face truth in the eye. Skin care is a minefield, and if you don’t do it right, you can harm your skin and your health instead of doing something.

Were you shocked to learn that you could harm your skin and your health? Unfortunately, there are facials on the market and anti-ageing products containing ingredients that can harm your health and your skin.

It’s not just facials. It can also include a wide range of personal care products, beauty and body care such as soap, shampoos and cosmetics.

Give yourself a quick example. A recent study of lipsticks by leading brands found that more than 50% of tested lipsticks lead. These are not unfamiliar inexpensive lipsticks, but big brands that you may be using today.

And it’s not limited to lead lipsticks. Many skin care products, anti-ageing and cosmetic products contain a large number of suspicious ingredients, some of which are known to even cause cancer.

So if you weren’t interested in it before, now you can start to show more interest in natural skin care. Check the facts and start learning more about your personal products.

But even though big brands may contain dubious ingredients, you’re still getting older and you still have wrinkles on your face. What can you do about it?

Fortunately, there are small niche anti-aging companies that are aware of the problems with anti-aging lines of a major brand. They produce a wide range of natural products for skin, face and face care, such as superior lotions and face creams that use natural ingredients that are known to be safe to use on your skin and effective for improving skin health.

In fact, the best natural skin products are much more effective for getting the desired result than the big brands.

Why is that? Because big companies spend most of their budget on marketing. You’re probably tired of all these TV commercials about a new and better anti-ageing product that advertise big names that probably never used this product, and get a lot of money to tell you how good it is.

All this television advertising costs a fortune, and these companies usually spend their budgets on marketing campaigns to the detriment of product quality.

These small niche skin care companies cannot compete in marketing because they don’t have the budget to compete for quality products. They produce products of excellent quality.

One of them, in particular, produces a new anti-ageing line, which is comparable in cost to the main brands, but at the same time is absolutely safe to use and extremely effective. They are confident enough in the safety and effectiveness of their products, so they are ready to offer their customers a money back guarantee.

Try this from one of the big brands.

So, if you’ve decided it’s time to think about natural skin care, look the truth in your eyes. Natural anti-ageing products are safer, more efficient and more competitive than mainstream brands. You can even try them without risk thanks to the money back guarantee.

Good natural face masks are now available. This is only available from a small number of niche companies, most of which have never been heard of because they do not advertise on television. Despite this, they produce some of the best anti-ageing products in the world.

According to NHS estimates, 34,000 people are dying unnecessarily in NHS hospitals today. Further calculations yield about 38,000 unnecessary deaths per year. Compare that to Iraq, where the UN estimates that 35,000 people have died in recent years, and we called it a “civil war.” In addition, the National Health Service recognizes that an estimated 25,000 people are unnecessarily unable to work in NHS hospitals every year.

The differences between the UK health service and some of our European neighbours are worrying. More than 6,000 people (about 120 per week) die each year from hospital infections. If we could bring them down to the level of other Nordic countries, we would have only 100 deaths a year from these infections (only 2 per week). In addition, of the 157,000 people who die each year from serious diseases such as cancer or stroke, about 23,000 (more than 400 per week) would have survived if treated in another European country in the United States.

But the cold statistics provide little real information about the tens of thousands of family tragedies caused by the National Health Service riots. A 40-year-old friend of mine was hospitalized with an upset stomach. The following year, he suffered three kidney failures at two different hospitals as a result of dehydration – he did not drink enough water. The third time he was admitted to the hospital only to have his little finger amputated. Two days after the operation, he was accidentally discharged due to kidney failure, and that night he fell into a coma. He survived, but only after losing both legs, losing sight and carrying a tracheotomy (he had his throat slit and a tube inserted so he could breathe). Under pressure to be ‘hot bed’ (clean the bed for another patient) doctors did not look at the blood tests taken that day, which showed that he was likely to die, and he was sent home. Finally, a few months later, with increasing pain and an inability to walk normally, talk, see or breathe, my friend committed suicide to relieve his family of the burden of caring for him.

Unfortunately, my friend’s story is not an isolated anomaly. Thousands of people die every year in the current NHS because of a lack of basic care. A few months before my boyfriend was fired due to kidney failure, an eight-year-old boy was discharged from the same hospital, also due to kidney failure – tragically he died when he returned home. During a visit to my friend at the hospital, his wife saw several patients die every week for lack of care. Nurses called it “hospital syndrome” and often said, “Last night we lost another because of hospital syndrome.” However, doctors have always told family members that patients have died from a natural cause – their diseases. Also, since I published the book “What’s the Difference?” about what happened to my friend, his wife and I, people with more than 800 similar stories – family members who died in NHS hospitals because of poor care and lack of food and water. This widespread disregard appears to be borne out by a recent coroner’s inquest, when a medical consultant who revealed the patient’s death said he saw two to three patients dying of dehydration each week in one hospital.

It seems improbable that such situations can occur in such a developed country as Great Britain. But it appears that some hospitals are seeing a decline in patient care.

To make things easier, we can say that there are four groups of people who need to work together to save the lives of patients in hospitals: doctors, nurses, cleaners and caterers. As part of a trend towards cutting costs and attracting third-party resources that are not considered “necessary,” NHS management has decided that cleaning and food should be left to the cheapest private company. This turned out to be a fatal mistake for thousands of patients.

The hospital cleaner meets nurses, learns about services and even makes friends with patients. Even if they are “just cleaners,” they will consider themselves part of the team responsible for patient welfare.

Outsourcing of catering has had similar catastrophic and unintended consequences. People handing out food should take food and pick it up at certain times so that their employers can make a profit on their contracts. They don’t believe that some patients really can’t reach for bowls of food, that others may have conditions such as arthritis that allow them to open even a portion of food, or that some may be so numb that their food is gone. Their. On guard.

A quote from only one of the hundreds of people who contacted me illustrates how we neglect vulnerable patients: “I’ve seen shocking examples of terrible care for elderly people in a hospital ward. Women in their 80s and 90s, often after a stroke or fall, some blind, some in plaster, many motionless, need help to move around – the food was put on trays on their bedside tables and just left, and staff went to the teacher’s room to discuss older women not eating unaided. Some were placed too far away from food and could not access it. Some blind people couldn’t see to eat. Some could not eat because of the symptoms of a stroke. Some had no appetite and needed support. All failed on the part of the staff. After about 30 minutes, the staff came out and very quickly threw away all the garbage, so many were left untouched! “

Since nurses are constantly in the ward, theoretically their job is to coordinate patient care. But nurses are drowning in a sea of new material that distracts them from the work they want to do. And when nurses have the opportunity to care for their patients, they face obstacles that waste their time – for example, if a vulnerable patient is placed in a bed with blood and faeces on the curtains around the bed, the nurse should call a responsible manager . . . is to work with an external cleaning company to hire a cleaner to solve the problem. Sometimes it can take a day – enough for a newly operated patient to contract a life-threatening infection.

Post Author: admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *